Oncological treatment follows the same stage principles as sporadic colorectal cancer, but the extent of colectomy requires additional consideration because retained colon remains at substantial risk of a second primary cancer.
For a young fit patient with colon cancer and an MLH1 or MSH2 pathogenic variant, subtotal colectomy with ileorectal or ileosigmoid anastomosis should be seriously considered because it markedly reduces metachronous colon cancer risk.
For MSH6 or PMS2 carriers, segmental oncological colectomy is often reasonable because metachronous risk is lower. Age, baseline bowel function, comorbidity and patient preference remain critical.
A segmental colectomy remains acceptable when functional consequences of extended colectomy outweigh the cancer prevention benefit, but the remaining colon then requires lifelong intensive surveillance.
Primary rectal cancer is usually treated with standard oncological proctectomy. Total proctocolectomy may be considered when previous colon cancer, extensive synchronous neoplasia or future metachronous risk justifies the additional functional cost.
Mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer is particularly sensitive to immune checkpoint therapy.