Hyperprolactinaemia
Also known as: Prolactinoma
Elevated circulating prolactin, arising from a range of physiological, pharmacological and pathological causes. Prolactinoma (a prolactin secreting pituitary adenoma) is the commonest pathological pituitary cause.
However, a broad differential must be systematically considered before a specific pathological diagnosis is confirmed:
- physiological causes (pregnancy, breastfeeding, stress)
- medication effects (particularly dopamine antagonist antipsychotics and certain antiemetics, given the normal inhibitory dopaminergic control of prolactin secretion)
- primary hypothyroidism (through elevated thyrotropin releasing hormone driving prolactin co-secretion)
- the "stalk effect"
The "stalk effect" is compression of the pituitary stalk by any sellar or suprasellar mass lesion. This disrupts normal inhibitory dopaminergic transport from the hypothalamus and produces mild, secondary prolactin elevation. The mass need not itself be a prolactin secreting tumour.
Pathophysiology and the stalk effect
- Prolactin secretion is normally under predominant tonic inhibitory control from hypothalamic dopamine. Dopamine is delivered via the pituitary portal circulation through the pituitary stalk.
- Any process disrupting this inhibitory pathway can produce hyperprolactinaemia. One cause is a prolactin secreting tumour producing autonomous excess secretion. Another is an unrelated sellar or suprasellar mass compressing the stalk and disrupting dopamine delivery (the "stalk effect").
- The distinction matters because the clinical and management implications differ.
- The degree of prolactin elevation is an important clue to the mechanism. Very high levels (generally above 5000 mU per litre, or the locally relevant substantially elevated threshold) strongly support a significant prolactin secreting macroprolactinoma.
- More modest elevation is compatible with several causes: the stalk effect from a non-functioning or other sellar mass, medication effect, or a small microprolactinoma. The degree of elevation, considered with imaging findings, supports the distinction.













